| 
 |  
| 
 transgressions of His will, nevertheless it is possible that one 
transgression should be greater and worse than another. The degree of guilt, 
however, is dependent not merely upon its outward description and its injurious 
results, but upon the purpose and object with which man committed the sin. 
Therefore man cannot properly and completely know and recognize the greatness, 
power and limit of sin. Only the almighty and all-knowing God can do that. Hence 
it is impossible that certain specified acts should be rightly divided into 
great and little sins, as it is the custom of some theologians to 
divide them; for this erroneous idea arises from their not being aware of the 
inward nature of sin. It is possible that one and the same sinful act may be 
done by two different persons, and yet a greater amount of guilt may rest upon 
one than upon the other. For instance: one man has purposely committed a murder, 
and another has killed a person, without any intention of doing so, while in a 
passion. One person has stolen through covetousness and ill-will, another 
through poverty and distress. One man has committed adultery through sudden 
temptation and opportunity, while another has striven to find an opportunity and 
has committed the sin with premeditation. In these cases, though each of the two 
has been guilty of one and the same evil deed, yet the sin of the one is worse 
and greater than that of the other. Thus inward sin, which most men consider 
trifling, at times is in 
 |  
    
 
 | 
| 
 |  
| 
 God's sight greater and worse than even outward sin. For example, a person 
has ever cherished in his heart the desire of committing impurity, but through 
fear and inability and lack of opportunity has never ventured or been able to 
commit that sin. But another person, who has not had such a vile and evil desire 
in his heart, has committed adultery through falling unawares into temptation. 
It is evident that, though the former person has not outwardly been guilty of 
this sin, yet in the sight of God who knows men's hearts his offence is greater 
than that of the latter.  
  
Besides this, there are many deeds which are outwardly in accordance with 
God's commandments, but which, on account of the evil thought, purpose and 
intention with which they are done, are wicked and hateful in the sight of the 
holy God. For example, a person, perhaps, says his prayers or gives alms or 
performs some other deed which outwardly appears good and commendable, but does 
it with the object and intention that people seeing it may call him devout and 
honour him as such, or in order that he may in this way gain for himself some 
worldly advantage. Under such circumstances all such acts are hateful and 
unacceptable in the sight of God who knows what is secret. And, though, in men's 
opinion, such a person is to be considered devout and pious and self-denying, 
and gains a reputation as such, yet on the resurrection day, when the secrets of 
all shall be made 
 |  
 
 |